Lyamba

Lyamba v. Gonzales

Good Law
137 F. App'x 91
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 2005No. 04-71266California355 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Beatus Subirá Jude Lyamba, a native and citizen of Tanzania, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order finding him statutorily ineligible for adjustment of status on the ground that Lyamba made a false claim to United States citizenship. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the IJ’s findings of fact, Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

Contrary to Lyamba’s contention, the IJ properly placed the burden of proof on Lyamba to show that he was not inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(6)(C)(ii). At his removal hearing, Lyamba conceded that he was removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(1)(C)® for failure to maintain his nonimmigrant status. Because Lyamba sought relief from removal by applying for adjustment of status, he bore the burden of establishing his eligibility for adjustment. See 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (a) (an alien applying for adjustment of status bears the burden of showing that he is “admissible to the United States for permanent residence”); Pichardo v. INS, 216 F.3d 1198, 1200 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.