Coxon

Coxon v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Good Law
137 F. App'x 975
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 2005No. 03-73732; SEC No. SEC 03-9218California584 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*976 MEMORANDUM **

Petitioners Terence Coxon and World Money Managers (“WMM”) appeal the final order of the Security and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) entered on August 25, 2003. We affirm.

A disgorgement calculation requires only a “reasonable approximation of profits causally connected to the violation.” SEC v. First Pac. Bancorp, 142 F.3d 1186 , 1192 (9th Cir.1998) (citation omitted). Any doubts regarding the amount to disgorge are resolved against the petitioners as any “risk of uncertainty should fall on the wrongdoer whose illegal conduct created that uncertainty.” SEC v. First City Fin. Corp., 890 F.2d 1215, 1232 (D.C.Cir.1989). Relying on expert testimony, the Commission properly found that only $100,000 was necessary to capitalize World Money Securities (“WMS”) and operate it for the benefit of the Permanent Portfolio. Because WMS was instead capitalized with $950,000, the Commission reasonably concluded that $850,000 was being improperly diverted to WMS by the petitioners. There was also sufficient evidence that WMS was established and used by the petitioners to channel funds from the Permanent Portfolio to other business ventures to the benefit of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.