Hussain

Hussain v. Gonzales

Good Law
140 F. App'x 693
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 4, 2005No. 03-72200; Agency No. A70-914-172California259 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Mohammad Hussain, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his untimely motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to former 8 U.S.C. § 1105a. We review for abuse of discretion, see Movsisian v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA properly denied Hussain’s motion to reopen as untimely because Hussain did not file his motion until more than four years after the BIA’s decision, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2) (motion to reopen must be filed within ninety days of BIA’s decision), and failed to demonstrate changed circumstances arising in the country of nationality to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time and numerical limitations on motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(3)(ii). Accordingly, the BIA’s denial of Hussain’s motion to reopen was not arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law. See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002).

We are without jurisdiction to review Hussain’s challenge to the BIA’s March 31, 1998 dismissal of his appeal on the merits, because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.