Martinez

Martinez v. Gonzales

Good Law
141 F. App'x 613
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 4, 2005No. 04-73744California243 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Alexander Flores Martinez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to remand to apply for relief under the Convention Against Torture, and dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to remand, Movsisian v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to remand because Flores Martinez failed to provide any evidence that he would be at risk of suffering torture if he were returned to Guatemala. See Rodriguez v. INS, 841 F.2d 865, 867 (9th Cir.1987) (motion to remand requires showing of prima facie eligibility for relief sought).

Flores Martinez waived any challenge to the denial of his application for eancellation of removal by failing to raise this issue in his opening brief. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1996).

Flores Martinez’s voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.