Saavedra-Rojas

MEMORANDUM **

Olegario Saavedra-Rojas appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a term of imprisonment. He contends that the district court lacked authority to impose a new term of imprisonment because the imposition of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583 was unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 , 124 S.Ct. 2531 , 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 764 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) (upholding § 3583).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.