Venegas-Garcia

United States v. Venegas-Garcia

Good Law
142 F. App'x 290
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 25, 2005No. 04-30540California346 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*291 MEMORANDUM **

Jose Venegas-Garcia was convicted by a jury of unlawful reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826 (a). He contends there is insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict because the Government failed to prove that he entered the country without consent. We affirm the conviction and remand for re-sentencing.

DISCUSSION

An alien who has been previously deported violates § 1326(a) if he “enters, attempts to enter, or is at any time found in” the United States unless “the Attorney General has expressly consented to such alien’s reapplying for admission.” United States v. Pina-Jaime, 332 F.3d 609, 611 (9th Cir.2003) (internal quotation omitted). Venegas-Garcia argues he entered with consent because he was admitted at a border checkpoint after presenting an unexpired border crossing card issued to him prior to his deportation. We reject that argument.

The Government may prove lack of consent by demonstrating that the alien did not submit the required forms to reapply for admission. See id. at 612 . The Government presented such evidence here and a reasonable jury could have thus concluded that Venegas-Garcia did not have permission to reenter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.