Benitez

Benitez v. Gonzales

Good Law
142 F. App'x 322
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 2005No. 04-73090California377 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Neltun Wilfredo Linares Benitez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his motion to reconsider the IJ’s previous order denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction under former 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a) and we apply the transitional rules. Konstantinova v. INS, 195 F.3d 528, 529 (9th Cir.1999). We review for abuse of discretion, id., and we deny the petition for review.

Benitez applied for asylum in 1994, failed to appear at his hearing before the IJ in 1995, and was ordered deported in absentia. In 2002 he moved to reopen, but offered no explanation for his failure to file within the 90-day time limit on motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 (b)(1). Rather, Benitez sought to reapply for asylum because of changed country conditions in El Salvador. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 (b)(4)(i) (“The time and numerical limitations [on motions to reopen] ... shall not apply if the basis of the motion is to apply for asylum ... and is based on changed country conditions ... ”). Benitez supported his motion with a single-page…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.