Mariano

Mariano v. U.S. Department of Labor

Good Law
143 F. App'x 6
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 2005No. 04-70198California233 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*7 MEMORANDUM ***

Leonardo C. Mariano petitions pro se for review of the Department of Labor Benefits Review Board (“Board”) decision affirming the decision of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) denying permanent total disability benefits under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 38 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 . Our jurisdiction is governed by 33 U.S.C. § 921 (c). We review for errors of law and adherence to the substantial evidence standard, Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Co. v. Director, OWCP, 58 F.3d 419, 421 (9th Cir.1995), and deny the petition for review.

The ALJ’s adverse credibility determinations were supported by substantial evidence due to Mariano’s inconsistent testimony and demeanor. See Goldsmith v. Director, OWCP, 838 F.2d 1079, 1081 (9th Cir.1988). The ALJ’s rejection of Mariano’s medical reports was also supported by substantial evidence as the reports were based on Mariano’s version of the facts. See Fair v. Bowen, 885 F.2d 597, 605 (9th Cir.1989). Accordingly, the Board properly concluded that there was substantial evidence to support the ALJ’s conclusion that Mariano did not establish a prima facie case that his injury arose out of his employment with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.