Thomas

Thomas v. Gonzales

Good Law
143 F. App'x 846
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 15, 2005No. 03-72701; Agency Nos. A70-936-663, A70-936-664California390 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Virginia Eloisa Thomas and Jorge Eric Thomas Franco, married natives and citizens of Panama, petition for review of the *847 Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of their motion to reopen removal proceedings for the purpose of applying for adjustment of status. We grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.

The government contends that petitioners have waived any challenge to the BIA’s application of a statutory bar to relief for those who fail to comply with a voluntary departure order. We retain discretion to review one aspect of this issue, however, “because the government briefed it, and thus suffers no prejudice from [the petitioners’] failure to properly raise the issue.” Singh v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1152 , 1157 n. 3 (9th Cir.2004).

The government also contends that “[i]t is irrelevant that the Board’s order denying reopening referred to the current version of the statute.” Reviewing the BIA’s decision for abuse of discretion, Singh v. INS, 213 F.3d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir.2000), we disagree. The BIA not only cited the incorrect statute, but also applied 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d)’s notice requirement to conclude that “[t]he consequences of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.