Gasga-Amaya

United States v. Gasga-Amaya

Good Law
143 F. App'x 907
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 27, 2005No. 04-50489California289 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Leo Nicolas Gasga-Amaya appeals from a 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 .

Gasga-Amaya contends that his 41-month sentence exceeded the statutory maximum allowed under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because he did not admit, and the government did not prove to a jury, his prior aggravated felony conviction, which the court used to increase his term pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2) and the United States Sentencing Guidelines. This contention is foreclosed by this court’s case law. See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906 , 915 n. 8 (9th Cir.2005) (explaining that a district judge’s enhancement of a sentence, based on the fact of a prior conviction under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, does not raise any Sixth Amendment problems).

Because Gasga-Amaya was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court to answer that question,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.