Bravo-Paz

Bravo-Paz v. Gonzales

Good Law
144 F. App'x 682
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 2005No. 04-74473California307 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Edwin Bravo-Paz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“U”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review the IJ’s opinion, which the BIA summarily adopted. See Singh-Kaur v. INS, 188 F.3d 1147 , 1150 (9th Cir.1999). Reviewing for substantial evidence, see Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir.2000), we deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel a finding that Bravo-Paz has a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of an enumerated ground because Bravo-Paz was never directly threatened and he remained in Guatemala for years after threats were made to his grandmother. See Lata, 204 F.3d at 1245 (holding that applicant’s fear was undermined by two-year stay in Fiji after incidents of harm). In addition, we agree with the IJ that the harm to his family members was minimal, and they continue to reside in Guatemala without incident. See Mendez-Efrain v. INS, 813 F.2d 279, 282 (9th Cir.1987) (holding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.