Liu

Liu v. Gonzales

Good Law
145 F. App'x 231
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 26, 2005No. 04-71928; Agency No. A95-315-266California226 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Hanwen Liu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We grant the petition for review and remand.

Substantial evidence does not support the adverse credibility determination. The IJ’s adverse credibility findings fail because the omissions identified in Liu’s testimony and asylum application, which involve a police shut down of a Falun Gong gathering and a police search of Liu’s home, were minor details within consistent and detailed testimony. See Bandari v. INS, 227 F.3d 1160, 1166-67 (9th Cir. 2000). Furthermore, the BIA’s determination that Liu’s testimony was inconsistent is not supported by substantial evidence because Liu’s statements, regarding his experiences at a labor camp, do not conflict. See id. at 1167 .

We therefore grant the petition and remand for further proceedings so that the BIA can address the merits of Liu’s case. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-17 , 123 S.Ct. 353 , 154 L.Ed.2d 272…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.