Ramirez

United States v. Ramirez

Good Law
145 F. App'x 600
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 2005No. 04-50168California1,242 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Edgar Ramirez appeals the district court’s denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment charging him with illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . Ramirez argues that a due process error during his removal proceeding made his deportation order fundamentally unfair within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (d)(3).

The Immigration Judge (“IJ”) improperly failed to notify Ramirez of possible relief from deportation. Sufficient information was before the IJ to have allowed the IJ to infer that relief was available to Ramirez as the unmarried child of a legal permanent resident (“LPR”). See United States v. Barraza-Leon, 575 F.2d 218, 222 (9th Cir.1978). The IJ knew that Ramirez had entered the country legally with his parents and siblings when he was young and that Ramirez had previously made an application to the INS under the Family Unity Program, a program which is available only to spouses or unmarried children of LPRs. See 8 C.F.R. § 236.11 . In addition, the INS attorney at the deportation hearing had a document in his possession that clearly stated that both Ramirez’s parents were LPRs. The IJ asked Ramirez whether his parents were U.S. citizens, but given…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.