Guoxian Wang v. Gonzales

Good Law
145 F. App'x 615
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 2005No. 04-74405; Agency No. A95-198-488California314 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Guoxian Wang, a native of China and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and the denial of his request for a continuance. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review due process claims de novo, Perez-Lastor v. INS, 208 F.3d 773, 777 (9th Cir.2000), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

Petitioner contends in his brief to this court that the IJ erred by denying his asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT claims. Because petitioner failed to raise any of these claims before the BIA, we lack jurisdiction to consider the contentions. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (stating this court lacks jurisdiction to consider issues not exhausted before the agency).

Petitioner also contends that the IJ abused his discretion and violated petitioner’s due process rights by denying petitioner’s request for a continuance prior to the hearing. Because petitioner had requested and received five continuances pri-…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.