Rousseau

United States v. Rousseau

Good Law
146 F. App'x 116
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 12, 2005Nos. 03-10509, 03-10544California358 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Frank Rousseau was indicted for wire fraud and conversion of funds from a health care program. After a jury trial, Rousseau was convicted on 21 counts, including 4 counts of wire fraud and 17 counts of embezzlement from a health care benefit program. He timely appealed both his conviction and sentence.

To obtain a conviction for Counts 1—4 for wire fraud, the government had to prove that: (1) Rousseau knowingly devised or knowingly participated in a scheme to defraud, or scheme for obtaining money by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises; (2) the statements made or facts omitted as part of the scheme were material; (3) Rousseau acted with the intent to defraud; and (4) in advancing or carrying out the scheme, Rousseau used mails or wires or caused mails or wires to be used. United States v. Woods, 335 F.3d 993, 997 (9th Cir.); cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1025 , 124 S.Ct. 586 , 157 L.Ed.2d 444 (2003).

To obtain a conviction for Counts 5—20 and 22 for theft or embezzlement in connection with health care, the government had to prove that Rousseau embezzled, stole or willfully and unlawfully converted *117 or abstracted assets of an employee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.