Moraila-Elizondo

United States v. Moraila-Elizondo

Good Law
146 F. App'x 190
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 2005No. 05-10089California243 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jesus Ernesto Moraila-Elizondo appeals his conviction and 50-month sentence imposed for illegal re-entry into the United *191 States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) and (b)(2).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Moraila-Elizondo has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed. Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that Moraila-Elizondo knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered knowingly and voluntarily); see also United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that the changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.