Singh

MEMORANDUM **

Binder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming without opinion the denial by an immigration judge (IJ) of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review *927 the adverse credibility finding under the substantial evidence standard and will uphold the decision unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. See Singh v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1139, 1143 (9th Cir.2004) . We deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination. Singh’s testimony regarding material events was vague, lacked sufficient detail, and, in several instances, was inconsistent or implausible. See Singh-Kaur v. INS, 183 F.3d 1147, 1152-53 (9th Cir.1999). As one example, Singh’s testimony about his residence within India for a six year period was contradicted by evidence of his residence on his passport and his asylum application. See Kasnecovic v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 812, 815 (9th Cir.2005). The adverse credibility determination is also supported by Singh’s…