Gonzalez

Gonzalez v. McDaniel

Good Law
148 F. App'x 599
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 19, 2005No. 04-16902California377 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ralph Miguel Gonzales 1 is a Nevada state prisoner currently serving four consecutive sentences totaling 344 months (28 years, 8 months) to 860 months (71 years, 8 months). Gonzales was convicted by a jury of four counts of driving under the influence causing bodily injury or death in violation of Nevada Revised Statute 484.3795. After concluding that a number of Gonzales’s habeas claims were unexhausted, the district court gave Gonzales the option to abandon these unexhausted claims and proceed on the remaining grounds or to suffer dismissal of his petition as a mixed petition under Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509 , 102 S.Ct. 1198 , 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982). Gonzales chose not to abandon the unexhausted claims so that he could appeal the district court’s determination that the claims were unexhausted. Accordingly, the court dismissed Gonzales’s petition and Gonzales appealed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we reverse.

Because any petition Gonzales filed in state court would be futile and because Gonzales has no state forum through which his claims can be heard on their merits, the exhaustion doctrine does not bar his claims. See Phillips v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.