Jaffe

Jaffe v. County of Santa Clara

Good Law
149 F. App'x 662
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 2005No. 04-15768; D.C. No. CV-03-00137-MJJCalifornia312 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Former county jail inmate Steven Robert Jaffe appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his action without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court’s determination that a prisoner failed to exhaust de novo and its findings of fact for clear error. Ngo v. Woodford, 403 F.3d 620, 622 (9th Cir.2005). We vacate and remand.

The Santa Clara County Jail System provides a three-step grievance process. The final step is to appeal a grievance response by directing a letter to the appropriate Facility or Division Commander who “will either affirm or reverse the decision and will give you a written response within one week.” The district court found that Jaffe failed to complete the administrative process because he did not write an appeal letter to the appropriate commander. Jaffe, however, contends that he completed the process when he received his grievance form with the signature of the “Facility Commander/Designee,” concurring with the response provided by Support Service. We find Jaffe’s position persuasive. Given that the final step of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.