Terrazas

United States v. Terrazas

Good Law
149 F. App'x 689
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 2005No. 04-30526California251 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jesus Terrazas appeals his 120-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .

Appellant contends that the district court erred in its denial of his motion for a safety valve, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (f). We disagree, as the record supports a finding that appellant had a leadership role in this offense. Because his role *690 as a leader in the offense precludes the application of a safety valve, the district court did not err. See United States v. Sherpa, [¶] F.3d 656, 659-60 (9th Cir. 1996).

Appellant also contends that the district court violated his due process rights when it determined that he held a leadership role in the offense, and thus he is entitled to re-sentencing, pursuant to Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 , 124 S.Ct. 2531 , 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and United States v. Booker, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). However, because appellant was sentenced pursuant to the applicable mandatory minimum sentence and not the United States Sentencing Guidelines, we reject his contention. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.