Hughes

United States v. Hughes

Good Law
149 F. App'x 692
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 2005No. 04-30529California1,064 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

INTRODUCTION

Valerie Hughes pled guilty to bank fraud in violation 18 U.S.C. § 1344 . Applying two-level enhancements for “more than minimal planning,” see U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1(b)(2) (1998), 1 and “vulnerable victim,” see U.S.S.G. § 3A1.1(b)(1), and a six-level enhancement for loss exceeding $70,000, see 2F1.1(b)(1)(G), the district court sentenced Hughes to fifteen months imprisonment. The district court also, pursuant to the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (“MVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, ordered Hughes pay restitution of $78,239.48. We affirm the district court’s application of the enhancements and restitution order, but remand Hughes’ sentence in accordance with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

I. REMAND

Alleging Booker error, Hughes contends the district court imposed her sentence while mistakenly believing the U.S.S.G. were mandatory. As the Guidelines are now discretionary and ascertaining whether the district court would have imposed a materially different sentence under a 'discretionary regime is not possible on the record before us, we remand for the district court’s discretionary reconsideration of Hughes’ sentence in light…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.