Pena-Sanchez

Pena-Sanchez v. Holder

Good Law
412 F. App'x 948
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 2011No. 06-72049California320 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Leonel Pena-Sanchez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir.2008), and we dismiss in part, deny in part, and grant in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that Pena-Sanchez failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005). We are not persuaded that Pena-Sanchez’s removal results in the deprivation of his children’s rights. See Urbano de Malaluan v. INS, 577 F.2d 589, 594 (9th Cir.1978).

We reject Pena-Sanchez’s contention the BIA engaged in impermissible fact-finding. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1 (d)(3)(ii) (BIA may review questions of law, discretion, and judgement de novo).

The agency declined to entertain Pena-Sanchez’s motion to reopen to consider additional evidence in support of his cancellation of removal application without the benefit of our decision in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.