22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T43f,MEMORANDUM ** Ivan Arevalo-Hernandez appeals from the 36-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Arevalo-Hernandez contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to address his argument for a sentence in the Guidelines range applicable to defendants offered fast-track dispositions. The record reflects that the district court did not procedurally err. See Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 359 , 127 S.Ct. 2456 , 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); United States v. Gonzalez-Zotelo, 556 F.3d 736, 740 (9th Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 83 , 175 L.Ed.2d 57 (2009). Furthermore, under the totality of the circumstances, the below-Guidelines sentence was not substantively unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51-52 , 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.24:T45f,

MEMORANDUM **

Ivan Arevalo-Hernandez appeals from the 36-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Arevalo-Hernandez contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to address his argument for a sentence in the Guidelines range applicable to defendants offered fast-track dispositions. The record reflects that the district court did not procedurally err. See Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 359 , 127 S.Ct. 2456 , 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); United States v. Gonzalez-Zotelo, 556 F.3d 736, 740 (9th Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 83 , 175 L.Ed.2d 57 (2009).

Furthermore, under the totality of the circumstances, the below-Guidelines sentence was not substantively unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51-52 , 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.