Waksberg

Waksberg v. Levene, Neale, Bender, Rankin & Brill L.L.P. (In re Waksberg)

Good Law
418 F. App'x 613
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 2011No. 09-56406California278 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The individual, Morry Waksberg, M.D., appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order granting Levene, Neale, Bender, Rankin & Brill L.L.P.’s application for compensation in underlying Chapter 7 proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d). We review for an abuse of discretion. Fitzsimmons v. Nolden (In re Fitzsimmons), 920 F.2d 1468, 1471 (9th Cir.1990). We vacate and remand.

The district court’s dismissal of the appeal was based on its determination that, despite its previous order to show cause detailing Waksberg’s procedural obligations and its extension of time for compliance, Waksberg had never filed a Statement of the Issues in the bankruptcy court. However, Waksberg filed a Statement of the Issues in the bankruptcy court by the final deadline the district court had imposed. Although the Statement’s caption contained the case number for a related bankruptcy case, causing it to be filed in that separate case, it also prominently bore the case numbers for the bankruptcy and district court cases on appeal here. Accordingly, it cannot be said that Waks-berg, who was proceeding pro se at the time,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.