United States v. Santana Ramirez

Good Law
421 F. App'x 715
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 2011No. 08-50351California160 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Magdalena Santana Ramirez appeals from her guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for possession of an unregistered firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (d). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ramirez’s counsel has *716 filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.