Breshears

Allstate Insurance v. Breshears

Good Law
154 F. App'x 664
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 28, 2005No. 04-17043, 04-17142California244 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jack and Dorothea Breshears appeal the district court’s judgment granting Allstate reimbursement for the settlement paid on their behalf. Allstate cross-appeals the district court’s denial of reimbursement for costs incurred in defending the Breshearses against the personal injury action. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

It follows from our disposition in the coverage case (No. 04-15428) that the personal injury claims against the Breshearses were not covered by their Allstate policies. Allstate is entitled to reimbursement for the settlement payment because it made that payment under a reservation of rights. See Blue Ridge Ins. Co. v. Jacobsen, 25 Cal.4th 489 , 106 Cal.Rptr.2d *666 535 , 22 P.3d 313 (2001). We therefore affirm on this issue.

The district court determined, as a matter of law, that the personal injury-action against the Breshearses did not create a potential for indemnity under their Allstate insurance policies. That judgment operated retroactively to reheve Allstate of its duty to defend, and entitled Allstate to reimbursement for the costs it previously incurred in defending the Breshearses. Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. MV Transportation, 36…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.