Espana

United States v. Espana

Good Law
155 F. App'x 265
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 16, 2005No. 04-50387California301 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Donaldo Perdomo España appeals from the district court’s judgment imposing a 77-month sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826 .

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for España has filed a brief stating that she finds no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. 1 No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). Because appellant was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court to answer that question, and to proceed pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hemandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005) (extending…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.