Chavez-Sandoval

United States v. Chavez-Sandoval

Good Law
155 F. App'x 337
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 2005No. 03-10609California236 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Rigoberto Chavez-Sandoval appeals from his conviction and 84-month sentence, imposed after a bench trial, for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 .

*338 Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Chavez-Sandoval has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Chavez-Sandoval has filed a pro se supplemental brief.

We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). We affirm the conviction. Because Chavez-Sandoval was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court to answer that question, and to proceed pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hemandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.