Boparai

Boparai v. Gonzales

Good Law
155 F. App'x 344
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 2005No. 04-72947California273 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Amandeep Singh Boparai, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992), and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s and BIA’s determination that petitioner failed to qualify for withholding of removal. Because petitioner was never physically harmed in India, his parents safely reside in India, and his brother safely attends medical school in India, petitioner fails to show a clear probability that he will be persecuted in India because his father is a police officer. See Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2003).

Petitioner waives his asylum claim for failure to raise the claim in his opening brief. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).

In addition, petitioner’s CAT claim fails because he did not demonstrate that it was more…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.