Alvarez

Alvarez v. Gonzales

Good Law
155 F. App'x 364
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 2005No. 04-74506California278 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Pedro Lopez Alvarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen his application for cancellation of removal. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . “We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion.” de Martinez v. Ashcroft, 374 F.3d 759, 761 (9th Cir.2004). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA may deny a motion to reopen if the alien is not prima facie eligible for the relief sought. See INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 104 , 108 S.Ct. 904 , 99 L.Ed.2d 90 (1988). Alvarez’s failure to voluntarily depart within the specified period rendered him ineligible for the relief he sought. See *365 8 U.S.C. § 1229e(d); de Martinez, 374 F.3d at 762-64 . The BIA therefore did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion to reopen.

To the extent that Alvarez raises equal protection and due process contentions, we lack jurisdiction to address those issues. Those issues were raised, and rejected, in an earlier appeal to the BIA. Alvarez, however, did not file a petition for review from that order, and did not, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.