United States v. Bull Child

Good Law
155 F. App'x 372
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 2005No. 05-30128California344 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Kenneth Michael Bull Child was indicted for assault resulting in serious bodily injury in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 113 (a)(6) and 1153. He appeals the district court’s denial of his Motion to Dismiss on Double Jeopardy Grounds, and we affirm.

Bull Child allegedly committed the offense conduct while he was on supervised release from a prior conviction for assault with a deadly weapon. Bull Child’s supervised release was revoked, at least in part, based on the offense conduct, and he received a twelve-month prison sentence to be followed by two years of supervised release in the revocation proceeding. Bull Child claims that he is being punished twice for the same conduct, first as the basis for the revocation of his supervised release, and second as the basis for the current indictment.

This circuit has previously determined “that punishment imposed upon revocation of supervised release is punishment for the original crime, not punishment for the conduct leading to revocation,” United States v. Soto-Olivas, 44 F.3d 788, 791 (9th Cir. 1995), and thus a subsequent prosecution for the same conduct does not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.