Miller v. Butler

Good Law
155 F. App'x 377
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 2005No. 03-56723California292 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*378 MEMORANDUM **

California state prison warden Diana K. Butler appeals the district court’s partial grant of the habeas relief. requested in Jadir A. Miller’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. The district court granted Miller habeas relief on his attempted rape conviction and left intact his convictions for attempted murder and false imprisonment by violence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we affirm.

Butler contends that the district court erred by finding that the California Court of Appeal’s application of harmless error review to Miller’s instructional error claim was contrary to Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275 , 113 S.Ct. 2078 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993). In light of our decision in Gibson v. Ortiz, 387 F.3d 812 (9th Cir.2004), we disagree. California Jury Instruction Nos. 2.50.01 and 2.50.1, as given in his case, impermissibly lower the government’s burden of proof and result in structural error that precludes harmless error review. See id. at 822-25 . Accordingly, the district court correctly found that the California Court of Appeal’s decision affirming Miller’s conviction for attempted rape was contrary to clearly established federal law, as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.