Cortes-Sanchez

Cortes-Sanchez v. Gonzales

Good Law
155 F. App'x 995
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 2005No. 04-75510; Agency No. A75-194-368California354 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Hernando Cortes-Sanchez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order adopting and affirming an immigration judge’s order denying his applications for a waiver of removal under INA § 212(h) and for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review legal determinations de novo and factual findings for substantial evidence. Thomas v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 1177, 1182 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA properly determined that Cortes was ineligible for relief under INA § 212(h) because the filing of an approved 1-130 does not confer lawful immigration status, see Ngongo v. Ashcroft, 397 F.3d 821, 823 (9th Cir.2005), and Cortes lawfully resided in the United States for only two years before the initiation of his removal proceedings, see Lagandaon v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 983, 989 (9th Cir.2004) (concluding that the period of continuous presence ends on the day the removal proceedings are initiated); 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (h) (indicating that an applicant must have seven years of continuous, lawful residence in the United States to be eligible for relief under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.