Brownell v. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community

Good Law
156 F. App'x 992
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 2005No. 04-15982California359 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Alton Brownell appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Salt River Pima-Marieopa Indian Community/Phoenix Cement Division (“Phoenix Cement”) in Brownell’s suit for failure to promote and constructive discharge under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the Arizona Civil Rights Act. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

With respect to Brownell’s failure to promote claim, Brownell failed to produce evidence of pretext under the third prong of the McDonnell Douglas standard. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802-04 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973). Brownell’s own evidence, in the form of the deposition testimony of Cliff Ayres, shows that prior to the time of the promotion decision there were problems between Lee Gorby and Brownell regarding Brownell’s job performance. Therefore, Brownell failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact suggesting that Phoenix Cement’s proffered reasons for not promoting him — problems with his job performance and lack of people skills — were unworthy of credence. See Merrick v. Farmers Ins. Group, 892 F.2d 1434 , 1437-38 (9th Cir.1990) (finding no evidence of pretext…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.