Soto-Galaviz

Soto-Galaviz v. Gonzales

Good Law
158 F. App'x 855
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 2005No. 04-74274California229 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jorge Luis Soto-Galaviz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider its previous order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion. Oh v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 611, *856 612 (9th Cir.2005). We grant the petition for review, and remand.

Soto-Galaviz filed his motion to reconsider within thirty days of the BIA’s order denying cancellation, and within his thirty-day voluntary departure period. The BIA denied the motion to reconsider on the ground that Soto-Galaviz failed to depart within his voluntary departure period. This court recently held that a timely filed motion to reconsider automatically tolls the voluntary departure period. See Barroso v. Gonzales, 429 F.3d 1195 , 2005 WL 3079103 *1 . Accordingly, we grant the petition for review and remand for the BIA to consider the merits of Soto-Galaviz’s motion to reconsider.

The voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate. See Desta v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.