Hawkins-Dean

Hawkins-Dean v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Good Law
161 F. App'x 684
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 2006No. 04-55277California415 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Appellant Peggy Hawkins-Dean was employed by Robert Half International (“RHI”) and was enrolled in RHI’s Long-Term Disability Benefits Plan (“the Plan”). The Plan is funded by a group policy issued by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) to RHI and is governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. This matter was originally before the district court in a separate action regarding Hawkins-Dean’s entitlement to long-term disability benefits under the Plan. MetLife denied Hawkins-Dean’s benefits claim, and she brought suit. Before the district court ruled on the parties’ motions for summary judgment, MetLife admitted Hawkins-Dean’s benefits eligibility, leaving only the amount of benefits in question. The district court remanded the matter to MetLife to determine the amount of monthly benefits due to Hawkins-Dean. MetLife calculated the amount of benefits as 60% of Hawkins-Dean’s earnings, not including stock options she received from RHI. This resulted in an amount significantly lower than Hawkins-Dean anticipated, and she again filed suit.

Faced with this controversy, the district judge held that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.