Flowers
Flowers v. Carville
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM ***
Gennifer Flowers appeals from orders granting summary judgment motions filed by Hillary Rodham Clinton, James Car-ville and George Stephanopoulos.
Clinton initially contends that we lack jurisdiction over Flowers’s appeal from the order filed November 24, 2003, because Flowers did not file a timely notice of appeal. Because the district court ordered entry of judgment in favor of Clinton, Flowers v. Carville, 292 F.Supp.2d 1225, 1234 (D.Nev.2003), and did not set forth judgment in a separate document, Flowers had 180 days from entry of the order to file the notice of appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), 4(a)(7)(A)(ii). Flowers timely filed the notice of appeal on April 6, 2004.
While the fourth amended complaint alleges Clinton engaged in overt acts in furtherance of a civil conspiracy, the district court correctly held that this claim accrued no later than April 1995, by which time Flowers had discovered all necessary facts. Flowers first named Clinton as a defendant on January 20, 2000, after expiration of the four-year limitations period. See Flowers, 292 F.Supp.2d at 1233-34 ; see also Siragusa v. Brown, 114 Nev. 1384 , 971 P.2d 801, 806-07 (1998) (stating…