O'Connor

O'Connor v. Commissioner

Good Law
163 F. App'x 513
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 17, 2006No. 05-70536California217 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Cathy J. O’Connor appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s decision dismissing for failure to state a claim her petition challenging the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s (“Commissioner”) notice of deficiency for tax year 2002. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482 . We review de novo a Tax Court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim, Grimes v. Comm’r, 806 F.2d 1451, 1453 (9th Cir.1986) (per curiam), and we affirm.

The Tax Court properly dismissed O’Connor’s petition for failure to state a claim because she did not set forth a clear and concise assignment of error or any facts demonstrating error in the Commissioner’s determinations. See Tax Ct. R. 34(b)(4); Grimes, 806 F.2d at 1453-54 . Moreover, the Tax Court ordered O’Con-nor to file an amended petition clearly setting forth the errors alleged, and she failed to do so.

O’Connor’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

We grant the Commissioner’s motion for sanctions in the amount of $3,000. See Grimes, 806 F.2d at 1454 (“Sanctions are appropriate when the result of an appeal is obvious and the arguments of error are wholly without merit.”).

AFFIRMED WITH SANCTIONS.

This disposition is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.