Hoffmann

Hoffmann v. Young CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 4, 2022B292539ACalifornia3,728 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/4/22 Hoffmann v. Young CA2/6 Opinion on remand from Supreme Court

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

MIKAYLA HOFFMANN, 2d Civil No. B292539 (Super. Ct. No. 16CVP0060) Plaintiff and Appellant, (San Luis Obispo County)

v. OPINION ON REMAND

CHRISTINA M. YOUNG et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

This case comes to us on remand from the California Supreme Court after its reversal of our previous decision, Hoffmann v. Young (2020) 56 Cal.App.5th 1021 (Hoffmann I). The Supreme Court’s opinion – Hoffmann v. Young (2022) 13 Cal.5th 1257 (Hoffmann II) – interprets Civil Code section 846, which establishes the recreational use immunity defense.1 The defense…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.