Alamaguer-Lozano

Alamaguer-Lozano v. Gonzales

Good Law
163 F. App'x 587
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 19, 2006No. 04-73784California336 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Santiago Almaguer-Lozano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.

Almaguer-Lozano contends that the IJ erred as a matter of law in concluding that he failed to satisfy the continuous physical presence requirement under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(A). Almaguer-Lozano testified that he was apprehended by immigration authorities and returned to Mexico multiple times after he initially entered the United States and before the issuance of the Notice to Appear. The IJ concluded that these apprehensions and returns constituted a break in Almaguer-Lozano’s continuous physical presence such that he failed to meet the requisite ten-years before issuance of the Notice to Appear.

We recently held that the fact that an alien is turned around at the border does not in and of itself interrupt the continuity of his physical presence in the United States. See Tapia v. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 997, 1002-1004 (9th Cir.2005).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.