Skannal

United States v. Skannal

Good Law
164 F. App'x 565
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 11, 2006No. 04-50210California479 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Clifford William Skannal appeals his sentence of 120 months in prison for conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 . Skannal argues that the district court improperly applied United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 4A1.1 when it added two criminal history points for a prior juvenile sentence to Camp Community Placement, making him ineligible for the safety valve provision of U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

We review de novo a district court’s interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines. United States v. Ramirez, 347 F.3d 792, 797 (9th Cir.2003). Section 4Al.l(b) instructs a court to “[a]dd 2 points for each prior sentence of imprisonment of at least sixty days not [already] counted.” U.S.S.G. 4Al.l(b). Skannal argues that his juvenile sentence did not result in a sentence of at least sixty days because he was sentenced to an indeterminate term of up to four years.

The Sentencing Guidelines are clear that the stated maximum of an indeterminate sentence controls for purposes of § 4A1.1. See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2, cmt. n. 2. (“For the purposes of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.