Medendez-Alvarado

Medendez-Alvarado v. Gonzales

Good Law
164 F. App'x 600
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 2006No. 04-72869California223 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Luis Alfonso Mendez Alvarado, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ dismissal of his appeal of an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition for review.

Alvarado contends that the IJ erred as a matter of law in concluding that his administrative voluntary departure in 1994 constituted a break in continuous physical presence such that he failed to meet the requisite ten-years of continuous physical presence prior to issuance of the Notice to Appear. This contention is foreclosed by Vasquez-Lopez v. Ashcroft, 343 F.3d 961, 972 (9th Cir.2003) (per curiam).

Alvarado acknowledges that Vasquez-Lopez resolved this issue, however, he urges this panel to revisit that holding. We decline to do so because a three-judge panel lacks authority to overrule Ninth Circuit precedent. See United States v. Lucas, 963 F.2d 243, 247 (9th Cir.1992). Moreover, a petition for rehearing en banc in Vasquez-Lopez previously failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges. See Vasquez-Lopez, 343 F.3d 961 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.