Muzquiz
Muzquiz v. Clackamas County
Opinion
Lead Opinion
ORDER
The petition for. panel rehearing is GRANTED. The memorandum disposition filed on November 30, 2005, is amended. The amended memorandum disposition will be filed concurrently with this order. No further petitions for rehearing or for rehearing en banc may be filed.
AMENDED MEMORANDUM ***
Plaintiff Gloria Muzquiz sued her former employer, alleging (among other things) a violation of her right to equal protection, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . The district court denied a motion for summary judgment by Defendants Newton and Fischer-Davidson on that claim. They bring this interlocutory appeal, arguing entitlement to qualified immunity. On de novo review, Jeffers v. Gomez, 267 F.3d 895, 905-06 (9th Cir.2001) (per curiam), we affirm in part and reverse in part.
1. Defendants’ main legal argument is that their motive is not relevant as *505 a matter of law. Where the underlying alleged constitutional violation has an intent element, however, deciding whether the defendant is entitled to qualified immunity necessarily involves inquiring into mental state. Id. at 911 . The Fourth Amendment cases cited by Defendants are not germane. Rather, here, to prevail Plaintiff must show intentional…