Vargas
Vargas v. Gonzales
165 F. App'x 538
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 2006No. 05-75006; Agency No. A95-394-350California118 words
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th *539 Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard), Aceordingly, this petition for review is denied. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 .
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.