Vazquez
Vazquez v. Gonzales
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Abel Zarazua Vazquez and Ignacia Gutierrez Aldaco, husband and wife natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s denial of their applications for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We grant in part and deny in part the petition for review.
The IJ properly determined that Ignacia failed to demonstrate the requisite ten-years continuous physical presence because she testified that she first arrived in the United States in 1994 and the government issued the Notice to Appear in 2001. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A) and (d)(2). We therefore deny the petition for review as to Ignacia.
The IJ determined that Abel failed to meet the requisite ten-years of continuous physical presence due to a break in presence in 1994 or 1995 when he returned to Mexico to visit his ailing mother. Abel testified that upon his attempted reentry into the United States in 1995, immigration authorities apprehended him, fingerprinted him, and then permitted him to return voluntarily to Mexico.