Quangping Wang v. Gonzales

Good Law
167 F. App'x 643
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 16, 2006No. 04-71338California320 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Quangping Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review adverse credibility findings for substantial evidence, Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s order denying Wang’s asylum application as untimely. See Ramadan v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 1218, 1222 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that the Court lacks jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that an asylum application was not filed within one year after the last entry into the United States).

The IJ denied withholding of removal on the ground that Wang was not credible. The record does not compel a contrary conclusion. See Chebchoub, 257 F.3d at 1042 . First, Wang’s testimony regarding the nature of the injuries he inflicted upon a family planning official was internally inconsistent and inconsistent with his application. See id. at 1043…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.