Meadows

United States v. Meadows

Good Law
167 F. App'x 676
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 2006No. 04-10696California156 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

John Nathan Meadows, Jr., appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 97-month sentence imposed for possession of, receiving, and distributing material involving the sexual exploitation of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252 (a)(2) and (a)(4).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Meadows has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Meadows has not filed a pro 'se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant-to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.