Laing

Laing v. Gallegos

Good Law
167 F. App'x 683
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 21, 2006No. 04-35945California218 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Richard Laing, committed to Oregon State Hospital after being found guilty except for insanity of second degree assault, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. We grant Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal.

Appellee has informed this court that appellant failed to return from an unsupervised afternoon pass while a patient at Oregon State Hospital and his current whereabouts are unknown. Accordingly, dismissal is proper. See Molinaro v. New Jersey, 396 U.S. 365, 366 , 90 S.Ct. 498 , 24 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970) (holding that a fugitive is disentitled from calling upon the resources of the court for determination of his claims); see also Conforte v. Commissioner, 692 F.2d 587, 589-90 (9th Cir.1982) (extending the fugitive disentitlement doctrine to civil proceedings).

This appeal is dismissed with prejudice subject to the following qualification: if appellant surrenders to authorities within 42 days of the filing date of this order, *684 appellant may move for reinstatement of this appeal. See United States v. Freelove, 816 F.2d 479, 480 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.