Cuellar
Cuellar v. Gonzales
170 F. App'x 23
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 2006No. 04-76509California116 words
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(1)(B); Lopez-Umanzor v. Gonzales, 405 F.3d 1049 , 1053 n. 3 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that presentation of false testimony precludes a finding of good moral character for purposes of cancellation eligibility).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.