Guoqin Zhao v. Gonzales

Good Law
171 F. App'x 81
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 2006No. 04-74184California313 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*82 MEMORANDUM **

Guoqin Zhao, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review adverse credibility findings for substantial evidence, Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA denied relief on the ground that Zhao was not credible, and the record does not compel a contrary conclusion. See Chebchoub, 257 F.3d at 1042 . First, Zhao’s testimony was internally inconsistent regarding his interactions with police following his release from detention for participating in a protest. See id. at 1043 (explaining that one material inconsistency can be sufficient to support an adverse credibility determination). Second, Zhao’s claim that authorities were monitoring him and that he furtively departed from China was inconsistent with his passport, which indicates he left China through normal procedures. Finally, Zhao failed to mention in his otherwise detailed asylum application, interactions he had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.